3 - Tactical Ventilation -
International Roundtable
EURO FIREFIGHTER
by Paul Grimwood
London 1988
We had a
series of experiences over a hectic few months that taught me a lot about
tactics but perhaps more about human psychology.
It was the
1980s and in London, it was a transition stage as we were just coming out of the
‘iron-lung’ era where firefighters, who often chose to ‘eat smoke’ as a
way of proving they had ‘balls’, were facing the conflicting enforcement of
occupational health & safety legislation. For years I had battled against
the forceful opinions of those who were either too lazy or too incredibly
complacent in their tactical approaches. Those who chose not to wear their SCBA
provided a good example. There was also a collection of company commanders
(junior officers) who were of the typical ‘reactionary’ belief that SCBA
wasn’t needed until it was needed! In fact our procedures were so rigid that
in some situations these officers refused outright to allow SCBA to be removed
from an engine until ordered. Then one after the other, there were some serious
lessons!
Views from London; New York; Madrid; Paris; Germany; Sweden; Oregon;
Washington - From VES to PPV to
Anti-ventilation - Its all here!
| 1. |
Attributes
of a pre-assigned task-based venting strategy |
| 2. |
Attributes
of a reactive ‘conditions’ based venting strategy |
| 3. |
Tactical
errors when using either strategy |
| 4. |
Staffing
requirements for primary response venting tactics |
| 5. |
Situations
when not to ventilate |
| 6. |
Situations
where venting should be a primary action |
| 7. |
Simplifying
the tactical approach to venting structures |
| 8. |
Basic
‘Glass Rule’ Concepts |
| 9. |
Avoiding
the ‘Error Chain’ in venting tactics |
| 10. |
Creating
an opening – Who is responsible? |
| 11. |
Door
control and air-track management |
| 12. |
Exterior
Wind Hazards |
|